F. Cina
To Win
C. L. C. Wong
To Win
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Yan Bai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W W L
Form
W W L W W W W L L WHead-2-Head: Wong 1 - 0 Bai
They have played 3 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Bai winning 1. The last match between Wong and Bai was at the Seoul Challenger, 29-10-2024, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 1 |
| Yan Bai | 0 |
Seoul Challenger(29-10-2024)
6
3
3
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yan Bai
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:33:59 | Average Match Time | 1:33:59 |
| 65% (52/80) | 1st Serve % | 48% (32/67) |
| 79% (41/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 34% (23/67) | Return Points Win % | 31% (25/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Yan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Duckhee Lee
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Yan Bai
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Yan Bai
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Mikalai Haliak
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Artur Kukasian
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Rigele Te
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yan Bai
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (139/109) | Win/Loss | 65% (425/231) |
| 54% (311/267) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (913/524) |
| 51% (2848/2721) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7213/5790) |
| 59% (115/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (354/184) |
| 51% (18/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (47/32) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (21/12) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1313 | Aces Total | 1393 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 831 |
| 1:30:18 | Average Match Time | 1:1:24 |
| 379.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 551.05 |
| 60% (9161/15252) | 1st Serve % | 60% (16339/27040) |
| 71% (6480/9161) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11142/16339) |
| 48% (2947/6091) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5433/10701) |
| 40% (583/1447) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1437/3207) |
| 39% (5962/15383) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12035/27962) |
| 33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 50% (4/4) | Masters W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (53/44) | Challenger W/L | 50% (98/97) |
| 60% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 74% (319/113) |
| 55% (134/243) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (414/620) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 56% (45/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (83/155) |
| 57% (46/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (82/144) |
| 88% (129/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (414/375) |
| 12% (129/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (414/37) |
| 21% (119/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (238/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
